Sign in or 

It is time to reconnect with your personal priorities and motives, as well as with the voice you share with your peers. The actors must realize that we have much more in common with partners that we compete with locally and across the county. Brand loyalty is not a great strategy in a climate of disruption. Foundations are also going to be losing staff, donors are going to move on and some groups and campaigns will be merging. Partners you stab in the back may be the only groups moving legislation in a few months. It will serve you well to spend time rediscovering the common language of the movement.
Generate cash flow and opportunities. In tight times, everyone should be looking for cash flow ideas and opportunities. All of us need to be reminded that we have multiple bottom lines and one of those bottom lines is that revenue needs to meet expenses. Be supportive and be flexible.
We also need to understand that the more we borrow, the more likely it is that we'll share. So we need to ask freely for help and support. We need to borrow people's conference rooms, borrow staff, printers, location, facilities, or support for an event. The more that we can operate on a borrowed economy, the less financial economy that we'll need to depend on.
Borrowing helps build trust, and creates interactivity across a broader part of the network. It is important to make sure that our network doesn't seize up in tough financial times.
The other side of the mandate for all staff to borrow is the mandate for all staff to share. Share your input, interest or your knowledge. Help people learn lessons quicker. What did you borrow in the last week? What did you share?
It is critical that you start to scan a wider field of knowledge for two reasons: --It affects your job, and your opportunity to add to the cash flow for your organization. --By scanning the field, you will see the trends. You will be able to jump on a policy opportunity with others. You will be able to notice where people are gaining traction, and where the resources are.
It is critical to learn how to scan huge swaths of the news, and of feedback from your peers. Make sure you are on the right list-servs, or divvy up that task across your staff. Make sure you read RSS feeds and use Google alerts. Go to briefings, meetings, conferences, gossip grapevines, and news sites. how to guide
If you find something interesting, pass it on to the right people or the right lists. Publish your findings. Try to create or participate in the echo chamber that gets louder and louder around legislative and funding opportunities. In a networked world, thought leadership comes from the analysis process, not the information itself. Publishing and sharing your thinking is a critical survivor skill for a network.
Success “bubbles up” when we learn what works and what doesn't work, and increase our movement’s “trial and error” capacity. The mechanism for that is process is feedback, and it starts with the members of the movement providing it.
|
MartyKearns |
Latest page update: made by MartyKearns
, Mar 26 2010, 2:43 PM EDT
(about this update
About This Update
view changes - complete history) |
|
Keyword tags:
None
More Info: links to this page
|
| Started By | Thread Subject | Replies | Last Post | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| salbertson | Scanning and Sharing | 2 | Dec 16 2008, 10:34 AM EST by kanter | ||
|
Thread started: Dec 15 2008, 1:49 PM EST
Watch
Hi Marty. Great site. To me, the idea that we all have to conduct wider scans and share what we find is hugely important, but the "sharing" part is always the hardest. So many technologies and so many people using different systems for sharing information (blogs, twitter, facebook, email, listservs, web sites, etc.). I work within a federation that includes individuals on the ground in 46 cities, providing service through 2000+ agencies, and it continues to be a struggle to share information effectively and/or allow things to bubble up in an optimal way. Is it better to allow important information, ideas and collaboration to arise from the less-than-perfect flow of ambient information that results from people using their own tools? Or, is it better to focus on a few tools and hope that people use them together? I know the tool is less important than the impetus to create and share, but it's not always clear that the cross-pollination between tools is transparent or efficient enough for the challenges we face in the coming years.
|
|||||